RSM logo
Obstetric Medicine

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
Obstet Med 2008;1:11-17
doi:10.1258/om.2008.070001
© 2008 Royal Society of Medicine Press

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sauvé, N.
Right arrow Articles by Rosene-Montella, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Original articles

The impact of an educational pamphlet on knowledge and anxiety in women with preeclampsia

Nadine Sauvé MD   * , Raymond O Powrie MD   {dagger}, Lucia Larson MD   {dagger}, Maureen G Phipps MD MPH   {ddagger}, Sherry Weitzen PhD   {ddagger}, Donna Fitzpatrick RN   § and Karen Rosene-Montella MD   {dagger}

* Division of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Affiliated to Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada; {dagger} Division of Obstetric and Consultative Medicine, Department of Medicine; {ddagger} Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Research; § Assistant Nurse Manager, Antepartum Ward, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Affiliated to Brown University, Providence, RI, USA

Correspondence to: Dr Nadine Sauvé Email: nadine.sauve{at}USherbrooke.ca

Objective: This study was undertaken to evaluate whether or not an educational pamphlet could improve knowledge without increasing anxiety in women with preeclampsia.

Methods: One hundred women recruited from an inpatient setting with suspected or proven preeclampsia were asked to answer a questionnaire assessing demographics, knowledge (primary outcome), anxiety and satisfaction (secondary outcomes) after being randomized to an intervention group (who received a pamphlet) or a control group (who did not received a pamphlet). The pamphlet and questionnaire, both designed by a multidisciplinary team, were read and answered at the same time.

Results: Baseline and demographic characteristics were similar between the two groups. Knowledge about the symptoms of pre-eclampsia was excellent in both groups (61% to 100% correct answers). Women in both groups were well aware that preeclampsia in the past (P = 0.22) and a family history of preeclampsia (P = 0.57) were risk factors. There was a significant difference in knowledge about the risk of some fetal complications, including death (90% versus 39%, P < 0.01) and all maternal complications (P < 0.05) favouring the intervention group. Despite increased knowledge about preeclampsia and its risks, anxiety was not greater in the intervention group. Overall, there was a trend towards less knowledge in vulnerable subgroups (non-white, low income and schooling levels), but the improvement of knowledge with the pamphlet was equivalent. Baseline anxiety was higher in the vulnerable groups, but was generally not increased by the pamphlet.

Conclusion: An educational pamphlet for women with suspected preeclampsia was able to increase knowledge without increasing anxiety.

Key Words: patient education • pregnancy • preeclampsia


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet MedHome page
A. Dennis
First issue of Obstetric Medicine
Obstet Med, March 1, 2009; 2(1): 44 - 44.
[Full Text] [PDF]